In a recent blog post titled "The Limitations of TDD", Jolt Awards colleague
Andrew Binstock shared some reservations Cédric Beust has about TDD.
When a person of extensive experience like Cédric speaks about testing, you
pay attention. And I did.
Among the very interesting quotes from Cédric that Andrew has reproduced,
the following really struck me:
Another important point is that unit tests are a convenience for *you*, the
developer, while functional tests are important for your *users*. When I have
limited time, I always give priority to writing functional tests. Your duty
is to your users, not to your test coverage tools.
You also bring up another interesting point: overtesting can lead to
paralysis. I can imagine reaching a point where you don't want to modify your
code because you will have too many tests to update (especially in
dynamically typed languages, wh... (more)
The rabbit is out of the hat: I'm indeed working on a new book. It's called
"RabbitMQ Essentials" and is published by PackT Publishing. Yes, you're
reading right, after Mule, it's now RabbitMQ's turn! Clearly, I'm
specializing in writing about animal-named technologies.
(C) Kallisto Stuffed Animals
Why writing yet another book about RabbitMQ? After all, there are already
several very excellent books on the subject out there. I think Ross Mason
gave the best answer to this question on Twitter:
Let me further articulate the reasons why I decided to embark on this new
book project whi... (more)
To be able to do anything useful, an ESB must be configured with all sorts of
parameters, from endpoint connection URIs to message transformation scripts
to content-based routing definitions. Moreover, ESBs like Mule can host
custom components, which will process messages and perform user-specific
actions on them.
Deploying a new version of an ESB configuration raises the question of
whether it will break anything. How can we build confidence that everything
will be just fine? If unit testing did it for standard software development,
what can it do in the realm of the ESB? Since... (more)
One of the very first CTO-grade decision I had to take in the making of
Snoget was to pick what would become our main transactional persistence
engine. Since we're using Erlang exclusively for our production servers, the
solution seemed easy: use Mnesia. But I settled for PostgreSQL.
At this point, anyone who's been dealing with O/R mapping (like Ted Neward
who said: "Object/relational mapping is the Vietnam of Computer Science"),
should cry fool: Mnesia would offer me persistence without any impedence
mismatch with the application runtime environment and I preferred a SQL
This blog is the formal introduction to the CRaSH console for Mule on which
I've been working for the past month or so. I've decided to interview myself
about it because, hey, if I don't do it, who will?
What is CRaSH for Mule?
It is a shell that is running embedded in Mule and that gives command-line
access to a variety of Mule internal moving parts. It's built thanks to the
excellent CRaSH project, a toolkit built by Julien Viet and sponsored by eXo
Platform, which allows the easy creation of embedded shells.
What can we do with it?
Well, it's easy to find it out. Let's connect ... (more)